Differences in academic performance based on emotions in mathematics classes

Authors

  • Nelly Rigaud Téllez Facultad de Estudios Superiores Aragón-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2719-5464
  • Roberto Blanco Bautista Facultad de Estudios Superiores Aragón-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Viviana Flores Herrera Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur
  • Mario Sosa Rodríguez Facultad de Estudios Superiores Aragón-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.29928273e.2025.10.82

Keywords:

Facial expresions, Analytic Geometric, Math performance, Control Value Theory, Affective Learning Framework.

Abstract

The use of technologies to analyze facial expressions for emotion recognition and performance enhancement in education is widespread. The aim is to gain deeper insights into mathematical learning within this context, especially Analytical Geometry, integrating emotions and academic achievement. To achieve this, the study employs the Control- Value Theory and the Affective Framework for Learning as theoretical frameworks. A study involving 95 students was conducted, recording their facial expressions, and extracting emotions, alongside objective and subjective performance metrics. The findings reveal that high-performing students exhibit more emotional variability than their low-performing counterparts in objective assessment, whereas the latter express greater confidence in their abilities in subjective evaluations. The study concludes with recommendations for improving mathematical learning based on these insights.

References

Bossé, M., Bayaga, A., Lynch-Davis, K., & DeMarte, A. (2021). Assessing Analytic Geometry Understanding: Van Hiele, SOLO, and Beyond. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1- 23.

Burroughs, E., Arnold, E., & Álvarez, J. (2023). Encountering ideas about teaching and learning mathematics in undergraduate mathematics courses. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55, 897- 907.

Doi:https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1007/s11858-022-01454-3

Calero, C., Shalom, D., Spelke, E., & Sigman , M. (2019). Language, gesture, and judgment: Children’s paths. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 70-85. Doi:https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1016/j.jecp.2018.07.015

Caratozzolo, P., Lara-Prieto, V., Hosseini, S., & Membrillo Hernández, J. (2022). The use of video essays and podcasts to enhance creativity and critical thinking in engineering. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing 16, 1231-1251.

Doi:https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1007/s12008-022-00952-8

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Flow. Kairós.

Delahunty, T. (2023). International Encyclopedia of Education. Neurocognitive and physiological measurement of STEM learning processes, 458-471. Doi:https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.13040-4

D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2012). Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 153-170.

Eckmann, J.P., Kamphorst, O., Oliffson, S., & Ruelle, D. (1987). Recurrence Plots of Dynamical Systems. Europhysics Letters, 4(9), 973.

Eligio, U. (2017). An Overview of the Growth and Trends of Current Research on Emotions and Mathematics. In U. Eligio, Understanding Emotions in Mathematical Thinking and Learning (pp. 3 - 41). Academic Press.

Doi:https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1016/B978-0-12-802218-4.09994-5

Geetha, A., Mala, P., & Uma, E. (2023). Multimodal Emotion Recognition with Deep Learning: Advancements,challenges, and future directions. Information Fusion, 2-38. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.102218

Harackiewicz, J. (2002). Predicting sucess in college: a longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. Journal of Education Psychology, 94(3), 562 - 575.

Jamaludin, N. L., Mohd Nasir, J. S., Isa, S. S. y Ali, A. (2023). @INNOVATIVEESCAPE: Students’ perception and perceived learning outcome using an online exhibition via Instagram platforms. Environment - Behaviour Proceedings Journal, 9(SI17), 471- 478. https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v9iSI17.5453

Karabenick, S. (1991). Relationship of academic help seeking to the use of learning strategies and other instrumental achievement behavior in college students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 221-230.

Miragliotta, E. (2022). Geometric prediction: A framework to gain insight into solvers’ geometrical reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65, 15. Doi:https://doi-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100927

Montgomery, D. (2017). Design and Analysis of Experiments. John Wiley.

Ng, O., Shi, L., & Ting, F. (2020). Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology - enhanced environments: dynamic geometry and 3D printing. International Journal of STEM Education, 50(7).

Doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1

Pekrun, R., Elliot, A., & Maier, M. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta - analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 21(4), 359 -386.

Pise, A. A., Vadapalli, H., & Sanders, I. (2022). Estimation of Learning Affects Experienced by Learners: An Approach Using Relational Reasoning and Adaptive Mapping. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computting, 14. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8808283

Prakash, J., Van Haneghan, W., Blackwell, S., Murugesan, D., Tamilselvan, G., & Tamilselvan. (2019). Classroom engagement evaluation using computer vision techniques. Pattern Recognition and Training XXX, 192 -199.

Sharma, K., Papavlasopoulou, S., & Giannakos, M. (2022). Children’s facial expressions during collaborative coding: Objective versus subjective performances. International Journal of Child - computer Interaction, 34, 1- 20. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2022.100536

Spector, J., Lockee, B., & Childress, M. (2023). Learning, Design, and Technology. An International Compendium of Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. Springer Nature.

Tze, V., Parker, P., & Sukovieff, A. (2022). Control - Value Theory of Achievement Emotions and its Relevance to School Psychology. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 37(1), 23 - 39. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/08295735211053962

Weisberg, S. M. & Newcombe, N. S. (2017). Embodied cognition and STEM learning: overview of a topical collection in CR:PI. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 38(2), 2- 6. Doi: 10.1186/s41235-017-0071-6

Woolf, B., Betke, M., Yu, H., Bargal, S., Arroyo, I., Magee, J., Allesio, D., & Rebelsky, W. (2023). FACE READERS: The Frontier of Computer Vision and Math Learning. AIED 2023 Workshop: Towards the Future of AI -Augmented Human Tutoring in Math Learning (pp. 1-13). CEUR Workshop.

Published

2024-10-16

How to Cite

Rigaud Téllez, N. ., Blanco Bautista, R. ., Flores Herrera, V. ., & Sosa Rodríguez, M. . (2024). Differences in academic performance based on emotions in mathematics classes. Revista Digital De Posgrado, (10), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.22201/fesa.29928273e.2025.10.82

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.